Uni-ball Signo Premier 207 0.7

My second review, another Uniball, this time a high end one.


The Premier is Uni-ball's high end gel pen, it comes in a size that's milimeters longer than the regular 207, it uses the same chrome tip and pocket clip. It is however, thicker, not a lot, but you do feel a difference. The main difference of the Premier is it's soft gel grip, it is a really comfortable grip, not just a rubber cylinder that increases traction, this soft gel grip squeezes depending on how much pressure you apply, and the grip area is thicker than the pen's body, but you can squeeze it to a much smaller diameter. I don't think I have seen a similar grip in pens other than Uni's Premier, Uni Japan (Mitsubishi Pencil Co.) α-gel and a pen marketed as Sensa, which I haven't seen in years.





This pen does come in a higer price, I can't remember exactly, but should be around the $6-7* tag, considerably higher than the regular 207, but once it runs out you can just add a new catridge. It sells in 3 body colors, silver, gold and a weird shade of blue/purple (kinda resembles a color offered in the Ford Explorer back in the late 90s), mine is silver, and all come with a 0.7mm black cartridge. I don't know what's the current situation with them, they might be offered with the 0.7mm now, I think Jetpens sells the 0.5mm ones. But again, you can replace the cartridge with any that fits. This includes
-Uniball Signo cartridges, 0.38, 0.5, 0.7
-Zebra Sarasa cartridges, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0
-Pentel Hybrid / Technica / Energel cartridges, 0.5, 0.7, 0.35 Needle, 0.50 needle, 0.70 needle
If you love needle point pens, the Pentel Hybrid Technica / Energel refill fits like a charm, it requires no modifications at all. I have no idea about the availability of such a refill, down here they only sell the normal refill, so I had to buy several Energels in order to harvest the refills for my 207.
It is also possible to swap nibs to get a needle point with 207 ink, or order 207ND cartridges from Europe, but that comes with a price tag.

Sticking to the original black 0.7 207 refill. This pen is really comfortable, it became my ally for the long chemistry summaries and other long pieces of work. It feels heavier than the 207, however, doesn't feel extremely heavy, a weight that becomes more noticeable with the Pilot G-2 Limited for example. I never tried this one in a school setting, since it's a nice pen that more than one would have wanted to steal, and I have the impression that the grip will attract dust and small particles, which give it a nasty feeling of being dirty, and is only cleanable with alcohol (this happens a lot with the Zebra Airfit pencil), something that would happen in minutes in my pocket.

It also seems to me that Uni-ball is marketing this as a pen that's more suited to a serious user who wants a good pen, one that looks serious but doesn't come with the price tag of a Montblanc, these people tend to have a pen that just gets refilled over and over again and is well cared for, instead of buy by the dozen marketing that is more suited to the regular Signo (or buy by the truckload like the Gelstick). In fact, I have only seen it packaged in single units and in some stores only. Its existence in Mexico is limited, perhaps none unless you buy them in the US and bring them down (such was my case back in February) and I haven't seen it in Panama.

I wouldn't hesitate to buy another one to have on my desk, but for everyday use I'd probably pick a regular 207 since I would be less worried about losing them or using them in dangerous places (labs for example). If my fears of it picking up dust and dirt are confirmed, I would completely confine this pen to desk use, since I store pens in the place that is more handy, whether that's my pocket, between the buttons of a polo, somewhere in my bag, etc. This one would make a good companion for a serious event (like a conference, Model UN, real UN important meetings, etc) since it looks good, professional and it's cheap (you are not immune to lose a pen in those cases so it's better to lose a Premier than a Montblanc)

Uniball Signo Gelstick 0.7

So the first pen to come to the keyboard is the Uniball Signo Gelstick 0.7.

First of all, this pen is a bargain. Staples has them for $8.79* a dozen, vs $18.69* for the Signo RT and $21.99* for the Signo 207; in round numbers, this is 1/2 of the price of the RT and 1/3 of the 207. The 207's ink is safer for checking and those things, but if you don't have anything that is at risk, just like I do, the 207 ink is useless.
*Does not include taxes, fees or delivery costs.

It seems like Uniball uses only two gel inks, regular and 207 and the same nibs on all their pens (with the only difference in size of course), so you're paying half of the price of a regular Signo just because it doesn't have a rubber grip nor it's refillable (ok, if you have the skills you can refill it, but for the price it's easier to just shell out $8.79* and get a dozen of new ones).

I discovered these pens by accident about 2 years ago (I thought they were highliters, they looked like them) and loved them, the low price and high availability make them very good pens. Keep in mind that I live in a place where it can take months to restock a particular model of pen, but these are readily available in singles, single color duos, dual color duos and dual color trios. In addition, some stores carry the full color palette of it, and sky blue and pink seem to be well accepted among teenage girls (sky blue was the color of choice of my former chemistry teacher too).

Of the large quantities that I bought, I'm only left with two, the others have been left behind in the trash can, the pockets of my friends (and their trash cans eventually) and one was lost in an airplane (I think). I find them really comfortable, the small triangular grip makes them comfortable for writing during long periods of time (plus, the low price makes them good for writing a lot, since the price per meter is half the one of the Signo RT), and these ones can be left uncapped for long periods of time without drying out (I think that's common to all gel pens, I just never do that). It writes nice, 0.7mm is my favorite for gel pens, it's the right size, I once tried 1.0mm and it's too wide, and 0.5mm and below can feel scratchy sometimes, 0.7 is the ideal. The shade of blue closely resembles that of the semi-translucent body.




























It is possible to split the pen in two, but because it's not refillable, there's no need to do so. In fact, the way the pen closes (it's not a screw-on) means that you'll probably end up with a lot of ink in your hands and fingers if you attempt to open it (pull the two pieces apart really hard).

If you're looking for a cheap pen to buy by the dozen or more to carry around to lend people or have them stolen from your desk, this is definitely a good option. They can't match the low price of a cheap ballpoint stic pen, but when compared to most gel pens, it's a cheap option, and cheap as in low price, not as in low quality.

EDIT
A blog reader, ratan, commented that

I suspect Uniball gel pens use the same ink in all products. This table touts their ink properties in regards to check washing. I see the gel stick, gel grip and 207 line here, so maybe (maybe) the ink is all the same? Or at least it seems the inks are all acid-free, fade-proof and waterproof.


This is what they list
SIGNO GELSTICK
KEY FEATURES

* Acid-free
* Fade- and Water-resistant ink
* Comfortable grip
* Helps prevent check washing except for the colors Pink and Orange

SIGNO 207
KEY FEATURES

* Helps prevent check washing
* Comfortable textured grip
* Fade- and Water-resistant ink
* Acid-free

So it seems like most of their Gelstick colors use the 207 ink except for pink and orange (who would use neon pink to sign a check????). If this is the case, then the price difference is just for the body style, also, means that Uniball makes more profit by selling the 207 at a price higher than the regular Signo, even though the ink appears to be the same. But a discussion on this will come later, with the Signo RT discussion